ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - Update 2023.

In 2018, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Given the large body of new evidence addressing the management of cervical cancer, the three sister societies jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines. The update includes new topics to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in cervical cancer. To serve on the expert panel (27 experts across Europe) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated practicing clinicians who are involved in managing patients with cervical cancer and have demonstrated leadership through their expertise in clinical care and research, national and international engagement, profile, and dedication to the topics addressed. To ensure the statements were evidence based, new data identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 155 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. These updated guidelines are comprehensive and cover staging, management, follow-up, long-term survivorship, quality of life and palliative care. Management includes fertility sparing treatment, early and locally advanced cervical cancer, invasive cervical cancer diagnosed on a simple hysterectomy specimen, cervical cancer in pregnancy, rare tumors, recurrent and metastatic diseases. The management algorithms and the principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

Pathological characteristics and prognostic effect of peritumoral capsule penetration in renal cell carcinoma after tumor enucleation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pathological characteristics of peritumoral capsule (PC) and the prognostic effect of capsule penetration on tumor recurrence in patients treated with tumor enucleation for clinically intracapsular renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: PC status was analyzed in 304 consecutive patients with single intracapsular RCC. Degree and side of capsule penetration if present were evaluated. Mean (median, range) follow-up was 49 months (46, 25-69). Local recurrence rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival were the main outcomes. Statistical analyses included the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 51% of RCCs had intact PC and free from neoplastic invasion (PC-), 34.9% had capsular penetration on the parenchymal side (PCK), and 14.1% had tumor invasion on the perirenal fat tissue side (PCF). None of the patients had positive surgical margins. The 5-year PFS rates for tumors PC-, PCK, and PCF were 97.5%, 96.7%, and 77.1%, respectively (P<0.0001). The multivariate Cox model showed PCF to be the sole significant independent predictor of PFS, whereas patients who had PCK did not present a significant increased risk in developing recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor enucleation is an oncologically safe nephron-sparing surgery technique. PCF is a significant and independent predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with clinically intracapsular RCCs scheduled for nephron-sparing surgery. PCK does not predict the risk of recurrence.